Table of Contents
In Case You Missed It: Art at MIT, Brandeis President's Legacy, and Why Speech Codes Endure

We know a lot of Torch readers were away for the holidays last week, so here are some excellent articles that you might have missed:
- FIRE President Greg Lukianoff wrote for the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s newspaper The Tech to review a series of recent in which “the expressive rights of artists were deemed inferior to others’ desire to avoid having their sensibilities challenged.” Greg writes: “[T]here is ... tremendous value in art that forces us to challenge our beliefs. Do we want to live in a world where artists are not allowed to stray beyond the confines of comfort, and where unusual expression is quickly suppressed?”
- Former ݮƵAPP intern and Brandeis University alumnus Daniel Ortner discussed the of former Brandeis president Jehuda Reinharz in Brandeis’ student newspaper The Justice. Under Reinharz’s administration, Brandeis was listed on ݮƵAPP’s “Worst of the Worst” list for its disregard for the fundamental rights of students and professors, including a 2008 case in which a professor was charged with racial harassment after discussing and critiquing the term “wetback” in his Latin American Politics class.
- Greg and ݮƵAPP Vice Senior President Robert Shibley penned an about the many factors that have contributed to the proliferation of speech codes on campuses nationwide. In order to fight them, Greg and Robert write, students and faculty must be willing to challenge these policies in court and legislators must work to pass speech-protective legislation. It’s a Herculean task, but a necessary one in order to protect the “marketplace of ideas” that colleges and universities are meant to be.
We highly recommend reading these pieces in full! Remember, you can always check out past Torch posts in our archives.
Image: “Painting” -
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

To speak or not to speak: Universities face the Kalven question
As political pressure mounts, Dinah Megibow-Taylor explores whether recent institutional statements defend academic freedom — or quietly erode it.

ݮƵAPP statement on Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton upholding age verification for adult content
Today, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to uphold Texas's age-verification law for sites featuring adult content, effectively reversing decades of Supreme Court precedent that protects the free speech rights of adults to access information without jumping over government age-verification hurdles.

Orchestrated silence: How one of America’s most elite music schools expelled a student for reporting harassment
Rebecca Bryant Novak earned her spot at one of the world’s top music schools. But after reporting her advisor for harassment, she says the school turned on her. Now ݮƵAPP is demanding answers.

ݮƵAPP to court: AI speech is still speech — and the First Amendment still applies
Is AI-generated speech speech? In a new amicus brief, ݮƵAPP says yes — and warns that when it comes to free speech and emerging tech, early missteps can echo for decades.