��ݮ��ƵAPP����

Atlas Data Privacy Corp. v. We Inform, LLC, No. 25-1555 (3d Cir.)

��ݮ��ƵAPP���� argues for the application of strict scrutiny to Daniel’s Law, which allows certain public employees to request the redaction of their personal information on public-facing sites.

American Association of University Professors, et al. v. United States Department of Justice, et al.

��ݮ��ƵAPP���� filed a "friend of the court" brief arguing that the Trump administration's actions against Columbia University are unlawful and unconstitutional attacks on freedom of expression, freedom of association, and academic freedom.

Öztürk v. Hyde

Leroy v. Livingston Manor Central School District

��ݮ��ƵAPP���� plaintiff Case Leroy was suspended for taking a photograph with friends simulating the incident that led to George Floyd’s death.

Alario v. Knudsen

In May 2023, Montana passed S.B. 419 banning TikTok from operating within its borders and imposing liability on TikTok if anyone in the state uses it. Although S.B. 419 plainly states that it singles out TikTok because of its failure to remove certain protected speech from its platform, Montana sought to evade First Amendment scrutiny by arguing that the legislation is nothing more than a common consumer-protection measure addressing TikTok’s data practices. ��ݮ��ƵAPP���� filed an amicus brief highlighting the pretense of Montana’s attempt to skirt constitutional constraints by characterizing its TikTok ban as a regulation only of nonexpressive conduct or “business practices.”

Murthy v. Missouri (also known as Missouri v. Biden)

Government officials in the Biden administration pressured and intimidated social media platforms into censoring speech that the officials didn’t like.

Henderson v. Texas

Three protestors in Texas were arrested for “obstructing a highway or passageway" after peacefully marching down a sidewalk.

Frese v. Formella

Throwing someone in jail for badmouthing a public official is profoundly undemocratic and un-American. But that didn’t stop police from arresting Robert Frese after he insulted them on Facebook. According to the Exeter Police Department in New Hampshire, Frese violated the state’s criminal libel law when he referred to an officer as a “coward” who was “covering up for a dirty cop.” The First Amendment doesn’t tolerate making a crime out of criticism, that's why ��ݮ��ƵAPP���� filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to hear Frese’s case and finally rid the country of speech-chilling criminal libel laws.

Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. San Jose Unified School District Board of Education

TGP Communications v. Jack Sellers

If elections officials get their way, freedom of the press is a dead letter in Maricopa County, Arizona. During the 2022 midterm election, county officials decided to deny a press pass to a reporter from The Gateway Pundit, an online news site, preventing him from attending election press conferences or visiting the voting tabulation center. County officials justified the ban by arguing the reporter wasn’t “objective” and was too political in his reporting. The real reason: Maricopa County elections officials disagreed with The Gateway Pundit’s prior reporting, which was extremely critical of how they handled other elections.